Ginsberg v. Gamson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*879Opinion
BIGELOW, P. J.
This case concerns a dispute over a commercial lease and the landlord’s performance under that lease. The parties disagreed on whether the tenant has the right to unlimited extensions of the lease. The trial court concluded the lease grants the tenant the right to unlimited five-year extensions for 99 years. A jury subsequently concluded the landlord breached the lease. In addition to compensatory damages, the jury awarded the tenant over $300,000 in punitive damages, based on a claim for “intentional interference with premises.” The trial court issued an injunction…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Salisbury v. HickmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Open Lake Sporting Club v. Lauderdale Haywood Angling ClubCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
- Aiken v. CastroSuperior Court of Guam · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.