Legal Opinion

Bryant v. American Seafoods Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2009No. 08-35960Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

The seamen concede that they did not incur liability or receive balance bills for additional medical expenses until after they informed them medical providers that they were not subject to state workers’ compensation limitations. Because the seamen did not receive balance bills from them medical providers until after they filed their third amended complaint, the seamen had suffered no injury-in-fact at the time the third amended complaint was filed and therefore lacked standing to bring their complaint.1 See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 569 n. 4, 112 S.Ct. 2130,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bancard Services, Inc. v. E Trade Access, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API