Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2008No. 2007-1039PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} Under Crim.R. 7(D), a court may amend an indictment “at any time” if the amendment does not change “the name or identity of the crime charged.” We consider whether an amendment that changes the penalty or degree of a charged offense is permissible under Crim.R. 7(D). We hold that Crim.R. 7(D) does not permit the amendment of an indictment when the amendment changes the penalty or degree of the charged offense, because such a change alters the identify of the offense. We affirm the judgment of the Fourth District Court of Appeals.

I

{¶ 2} Michael A. Davis was indicted in the Highland…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. HeadleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. RohrbaughOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. PepkaOhio Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API