Legal Opinion

State v. Rohrbaugh

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2010No. 2008-2127 and 2008-2249PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether plain error exists when a defendant pleads guilty to a charge in an indictment that has been amended as a result of a plea bargain to charge a crime not originally charged in the indictment. We hold that a defendant may plead guilty to an indictment that was amended to change the name or identity of the charged crime when the defendant is represented by counsel, has bargained for the amendment, and is not prejudiced by the change.

Factual and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Appellee, John Rohrbaugh, was indicted on eight counts by a grand jury. Count one of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Kline v. CarrollOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Kline v. CarrollOhio Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. DrainOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. BecraftOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API