Legal Opinion

Penney Farms, Inc. v. Heffron

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 1979No. 3128-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

Plaintiff, Penney Farms, Inc., appeals the damage award of a favorable judgment.

The sole issue is whether the trial court applied the appropriate measure of damages for injury to and destruction of commercial orchard trees when it awarded plaintiff $225.1 We find that it did not.

The purpose underlying tort damages is succinctly set forth in C. McCormick, Law of Damages § 137 (1935):

The primary aim in measuring damages is compensation [.] . . . [T]his contemplates that the damages for a tort should place the injured person as nearly as possible *152in the condition he would have occupied if the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Falcone v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Shotwell v. DodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Fuhrman v. Interior Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Wilson v. Brand S Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Seal v. Naches-Selah Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Penney Farms, Inc. v. HeffronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API