Legal Opinion

Seal v. Naches-Selah Irrigation District

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 31, 1988No. 8290-3-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Gerald and Jean Seal commenced this action against the Naches-Selah Irrigation District alleging that seepage from its irrigation canal across their property damaged their cherry orchard. They based their claim on several theories: negligence, trespass, nuisance, and an unconstitutional taking of their property. Only the negligence theory was presented to the jury. The Seals were awarded a net judgment of $2,310, representing a gross verdict of $46,200, reduced by 95 percent for their contributory negligence. The Seals appeal. We affirm.

In 1955 the Seals purchased 13 acres of property located…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gaines v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Lambier v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Kaech v. Lewis County PUDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API