Legal Opinion

Shotwell v. Dodge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1894No. 1107PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston Cov/nty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The respondents move to strike the bill of exceptions containing the evidence in this case, on the ground that no error is assigned upon any matter excepted *338to in the bill itself. The point, we think, is not well taken. The exception is contained in the record, being an exception to the refusal of the court to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not sustained- by the evidence. The bill of exceptions is merely a part of that exception, containing as it does all the evidence introduced at the trial. Where the error alleged is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lommeland v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Smith v. Chicago, Clinton & Dubuque R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Sawtell v. SawtellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  2. Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. United States Smelting Co. v. SisamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  4. Hopper v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Fuhrman v. Interior Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API