Legal Opinion

Fuhrman v. Interior Warehouse Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1911No. 9135PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Klickitat county, McMaster, J., entered April 5, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiifs for $630, in an action for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action for damages by M. P. Fuhrman and Frank L. Huston against the Interior Warehouse Company, a corporation. The complaint, in substance, alleges, that the plaintiff Frank L. Huston, being the owner of tillable land in Klickitat county, granted its possession to his co-plaintiff, M. P. Fuhrman, under a lease, by the terms of which Fuhrman agreed to pay Huston a rental of one-third of any and all crops grown thereon during the year 1909; that Fuhrman, with the intention of growing a crop of wheat hay, thoroughly plowed, cultivated, and prepared the land, and applied to defendant, Interior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smyth v. TankersleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  2. Foote v. ColvinNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  3. Shotwell v. DodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Aiken v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  5. Dinehart v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re OkaharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Berg v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Loudon v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Woodsend v. ChatomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API