Legal Opinion
Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 1995No. 2:93-cv-03346PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Before this Court is each Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff, Charles Christy. 1 In 1994, this Court denied the original Defendants, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Brady, Boschi, Greco and Stewart’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 845 F.Supp. 1097. This ruling was affirmed on interlocutory appeal by the Third Circuit in 1995 and certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court. 54 F.3d 1140. Now, after almost 2,000 pages of evidence and over 300 pages of briefing submitted to this Court, these Motions are ready to be resolved. 2
Th…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anne Galli v. New Jersey Meadowlands Commission Susan Bass Levin, in Her Official and Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- D'AURIZIO v. Palisades ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- D'AURIZIO v. Palisades ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Anne Galli v. New Jersey Meadowlands Commission Susan Bass Levin, in Her Official and Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.