Legal Opinion
D'AURIZIO v. Palisades Park
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 29, 1997No. Civil 93-4417(JAG)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENAWAY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss, or alternatively for summary judgment, of Sinisi, Van Dam, Sproviero & Sokolich, attorneys for defendants James Nichols and Carmine Verdicehio. Because both parties present extrinsic material, the Court will treat this motion as one for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Plaintiff Albert D’Aurizio (“D’Aurizio”), and his wife Debbie, are members of a large and politically active family in the Borough of Palisades Park (the “Borough”). For years, the D’Aurizios…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- White v. FauverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Palma v. Atlantic CountyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- In Re Bayside Prison LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Rivera-Sanchez v. Autoridad De Energia ElectricaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Concepcion v. ZorrillaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.