Legal Opinion · Dissent

County of Los Angeles v. Southern Counties Gas Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1954No. L. A. 22570Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

It appears to me that the gas company formula, accepted by the majority, attempts to deduct every possible dollar of invested capital from the distribution system before they compute the value of the distribution system attributable to either public or private ways. In this manner they seek to base the county’s share on little more than pipe in the ground. This is a complete misconception of the Broughton Act and its interpretation by this court in the Dinuba case. (County of Tulare v. City of Dinuba, 188 Cal. 664 [206 P. 983].)

The Broughton Act provides that the utility “shall…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Ocean Park Pier Amusement Corp. v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API