Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Roberts

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1917No. S. F. No. 6895. S. F. No. 6896PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

As the questions involved in both appeals, are identical, we shall discuss them in an opinion applicable alike to each case. Each appeal is from a judgment.

The plaintiff, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, sued to recover $41,000.45, the amount of certain taxes assessed to that corporation for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1911, and paid under protest. The judgment of the superior court was in favor of the defendant. The action of the other plaintiff was for the recovery of $1,693.99, paid under the same cir- 0 cumstances. The judgment, except in amount, was exactly the same as in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McHenry v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. People ex rel. Burke v. BadlamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McHenry v. AlforeSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. State v. Minnesota & International Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. County of Sacramento v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Robertson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API