Legal Opinion

United States v. Mellon

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 6, 1934No. 5386-5391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

These are qui tarn actions wherein the plaintiff, alleging fraud in the defendants’ income tax returns, seeks to recover for the United States and for himself statutory penalties and twiee the amount of the alleged unpaid taxes. The defendants interposed statutory demurrers, raising two questions:(a) Do the statutes of the United States authorize a qui tarn action to recover against one who has defrauded the United States by making a false income tax return; and(b) Under the statutes of the United States is it necessary to obtain the permission of the Commissioner of Internal Eevenue before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olson v. MellonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanley N. Howell, Warren S. Cochran, Cochran & Howell, a Partnership, Post Cleaners, Thrifty CleanersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. United States Ex Rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API