Legal Opinion

Olson v. Mellon

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1933No. 7560-7566PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

In each of the above-entitled eases a statutory demurrer has been filed by the defendant. The cases are qui tam actions, wherein the plaintiff alleges in each that the defendant has defrauded the United States of income tax due by means of a false and fraudulent return, and seeks a verdict in behalf of the United States and himself for twice the amount of the alleged unpaid tax and the statutory penalty of $2,000 imposed upon one who has presented a false claim against the United States. The demurrer asserts that no law of the United States exists which authorizes the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Capone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanley N. Howell, Warren S. Cochran, Cochran & Howell, a Partnership, Post Cleaners, Thrifty CleanersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API