Legal Opinion

Putnam County v. Smith County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM PUTNAM. Appeal from Chancery Court, Putnam County.— A. H. Robebts, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

The complainant, Putnam county, filed its bill attacking Acts 1905, ch. 370', Acts 1897, ch. 148, and Acts 1895, ch. 98, as unconstitutional on the ground that each attempted to effect a deduction of territory from complainant county and to add the same to Smith county, whereas, it is alleged Putnam county had at the dates of passage less than 500 square miles of area; the constitutional provision invoked being article 10, sec. 4, of the Constitution of 1870', which stipulates: “Nor shall such old county be reduced to less than five hundred square miles.”

Complainant county also sought to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Boone County v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Roane County v. Anderson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McMillan v. HannahTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Luttrell v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bledsoe County v. McReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Elmore County v. Tallapoosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Greene County v. Tennessee Eastern Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, a Division of the City of Memphis v. Auburndale School SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. School District No. 6 v. School District No. 5Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API