Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Hannah

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM CHEATHAM. Appeal from Chancery Court of Cheatham County. J. S. Gbibbue, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Tbis record presents a bill of interpleader, whereby W. G. McMillan, a land owner and taxpayer, brought the counties of Cheat-ham and Dickson before the Court, for the purpose of ascertaining and settling by decree which of them had jurisdiction of his land and was-entitled to receive his taxes.

The Chancellor decided the question in favor of the latter county, but the Court of Chancery Appeals reversed his action and pronounced a decree for the former one.

Cheatham was not one of the original counties-of the State. It was created by .and formed.under Chapter 122 of the Acts of 1855-66, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Indiana v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Roane County v. Anderson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Putnam County v. Smith CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Elmore County v. Tallapoosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Putnam County v. White CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Woods v. BallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Giles County v. Marshall CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API