Legal Opinion

Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, a Division of the City of Memphis v. Auburndale School System

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, Special Justice.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a customer is required to pay for all electricity consumed where the utility has, for a number of years, negligently under-billed the customer.

The circuit judge awarded the utility a judgment for $32,316.29. In a split decision, the Court of Appeals reversed, the majority holding the utility was equitably estopped from collecting all but the last six months of the under-billed charges.

The operative facts are not in dispute. In July, 1976, the customer commenced construction of a new building on its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. West Penn Power Co. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Va. v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Corp. De Gestion Ste-Foy v. Fla. Power & LightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Housing Authority v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. Boone County Sand & Gravel Co. v. Owen County Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  4. City of Wilson v. Carolina Builders of Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Habersham Electric Membership Corp. v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API