Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, a Division of the City of Memphis v. Auburndale School System
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, Special Justice.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether a customer is required to pay for all electricity consumed where the utility has, for a number of years, negligently under-billed the customer.
The circuit judge awarded the utility a judgment for $32,316.29. In a split decision, the Court of Appeals reversed, the majority holding the utility was equitably estopped from collecting all but the last six months of the under-billed charges.
The operative facts are not in dispute. In July, 1976, the customer commenced construction of a new building on its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shoemaker v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- West Penn Power Co. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Va. v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Corp. De Gestion Ste-Foy v. Fla. Power & LightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Housing Authority v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Boone County Sand & Gravel Co. v. Owen County Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- City of Wilson v. Carolina Builders of Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Habersham Electric Membership Corp. v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.