Legal Opinion

Smith v. Continental Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun District Court. — How. S. M. El-wood, Judge. Action at law to recover an amount alleged to be due on a policy of insurance. A jury was impaneled, a verdict was directed for the defendant, and a judgment was rendered in its favor for costs. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

ÉobiNSON, O. J.

— The policy in suit purports to insure the plaintiff against loss or damage by fire, to the amount of four hundred dolíai s, on a dwelling house, and three hundred dollars on furniture and other household property, for the term of five years from the sixth day of February, 1892. On the twenty-fifth day of January, 1896, the dwelling house and nearly or quite all of the personal property insured were destroyed by fire; and the plaintiff seeks to recover, on account of the loss sustained, the amount of the policy. The answer denies all liability, and pleads various defenses. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bloom v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Ruthven Bros. v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Boyd v. Cedar Rapids Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Hart v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Keenan v. Missouri State Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Born v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. KrammeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. McDonald v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Nicholas v. Iowa Merchants Mutual InuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API