Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. Cargill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tillman County; Action by Annie Cargill, nee Mathews, against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
It is urged that the court’s charge directing that, if the jury should find for the plaintiff, they should fix the amount of her recovery at not to exceed $350, was erroneous. This was the amount of the policy, and the sum which plaintiff would be entitled to recover, unless controlled by a vacancy permit attached to the policy on June 14, 1910, which by its terms limited the amount of plaintiff’s recovery to two-thirds of the loss or damage sustained. The limitation upon the amount of recovery was dependent upon the building becoming vacant, and not the mere indorsement of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Phoenix Ins. Co. v. DosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hickman v. London Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.