Boyd v. Cedar Rapids Ins.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Page District (Jourt. Action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Oi-i. J.
The defendant set up as a defense that the plaintiff, at time of the loss, was in default by reason of the non-payment of his note given for the premium on the policy; and also that the plaintiff had failed to serve upon the defendant proofs of the loss, as required by the policy. The two matters of defense will be considered in their order.
I. The policy provides that “ the company shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may occur to the property i. fire in-paymeniof11" Sote^suspen-Laws oFissof' wSv'er.10’ herein mentioned while any promissory note given for the premium…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keenan v. Missouri State Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Bloom v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Baxter v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. of London, Ltd. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Faust v. American Fire Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.