Legal Opinion

Ruthven Bros. v. American Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 29, 1897PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — Hon. W. B. Quarton, Judge. Action at law on a policy of insurance; There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The policy in suit was issued by the defendant, and insured the plaintiffs against loss or damage by fire, to the amount of one thousand dollars, for the term of one year. The property insured was a double, frame icehouse, situate on the shore of Lost Island Lake, near Ruthven. On the fifteenth day of October, 1891, during the life of the policy, the ice-house was destroyed by fire. The loss not having been paid, this action was commenced in May, 1892. A trial was had in November of that year, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. An appeal was taken to this court, and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Corson v. Anchor Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Jerrel v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Lake v. Farmers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API