Legal Opinion
APRI Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1999No. B132357PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
The issue in this case is whether a trial court has jurisdiction to reconsider its ruling granting a motion to quash service of process, when the motion is brought before judgment is entered, but the ruling is made after the judgment. We conclude that it does not.
Factual and Procedural Summary
APRI Insurance Company S.A. (APRI), is a French corporation with its principal place of business in Paris, France. APRI contracted with Sedgwick Consulting Group Cofast EBC (Sedgwick) to market and sell its product, Sante Service insurance policies. There is a controversy about the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Phillips v. TrusheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- 20th Century Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KastnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- G.R. v. IntelligatorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.