Professional Ins. Corp. v. Sutherland
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
The opinion of March 28, 1997, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor.
This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P. The question presented is whether the Alabama courts should continue to refuse to enforce "outbound" forum selection clauses on the grounds that such clauses are against public policy and therefore void per se.1 The trial court, relying upon precedent, refused to enforce certain forum selection clauses stating that any action brought on the contract between these parties would be brought in Florida. We now…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Manrique v. FabbriSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Jonathan Barnett v. Dyncorp International, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Alabama State Docks Terminal Ry. v. LylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte Town of LowndesboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte CTB, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.