Legal Opinion

Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1965No. Appeal, No. 272PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal by plaintiff, in an. assumpsit action, from an order of the lower court en banc sustain*125ing preliminary objections to foreign attachment1 and to jurisdiction; the latter objection was apparently based upon certain arbitration clauses set forth in the contract.

In 1960, plaintiff-appellant, Central Contracting Company (Central) entered into an agreement with a party contracting under the name of “C. E. Youngdahl & Company, Inc. — Crump, Incorporated — Psaty & Euhrman, Inc., A Joint Venture.” The joint venture had a general contract with the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Feldman v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Lynne E. Solomon, Parent and Natural Guardian of Patricia Solomon v. John F. Solomon, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API