Legal Opinion

Fuoco v. Williams

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1966No. 10362PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Plaintiffs, the Fuocos, appeal for the second time from an adverse judgment in their suit to quiet title to a strip of land, approximately 20 feet in width, between their property and that of the adjoining landowners, the defendants, Williams.

On the first appeal this Court reversed the lower court, which had submitted to the jury only the question of the location of the ditch involved, with instructions that there be a determination as to whether the ditch had been acquiesced in over a long period of time as a boundary line or was merely used for irrigation purposes. 1

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. King v. FronkUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ringwood v. BradfordUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Huddart v. McGirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Goodman v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hales v. FrakesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Manz v. BoharaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API