Legal Opinion

Shlensky v. South Parkway Building Corp.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1960No. 35455PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

Plaintiffs Harold and Max Shlensky, suing on behalf of themselves and other stockholders of the South Parkway Building Corporation, have been allowed by this court to appeal from an Appellate Court judgment reversing the chancellor’s decree ordering defendants, as directors of the corporation, to give an accounting for the benefit of the stockholders.

This appeal involves a determination of Illinois law respecting the obligation of corporate directors in transactions between corporations with interlocking directorates, and poses the question whether defendants have infringed this law in any of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Baldi v. Lynch (In Re McCook Metals, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  2. Brown v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Graham v. MimmsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Wright v. Heizer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API