Legal Opinion
Osmond Kean, Inc. v. Grosvenor
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided June 20, 1986No. Civil No. 34/1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Osmond Kean has moved for reconsideration of the court’s order that granted First Pennsylvania Bank’s motion to intervene. The motion requires the court to determine whether payment of a forged check by a bank constitutes an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of this action.1 After reviewing the thoughtful and persuasive supplemental memoranda of both sides, the court is of the opinion that leave to intervene was properly granted. As a result, the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, as well as its motion for execution of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, and Stateof Illinois, Appellant-Applicant for InterventionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Dennis v. KolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Louis A. Sabatino, as Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Jose Juan D'agostino, Deceased v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosa v. Virgin Islands Water & Power AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1995