Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Kolm

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1900No. L.A. No. 748PublishedCited by 16 opinions

.The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover for goods, wares, and merchandise, alleged to have been sold to the defendants as copartners under the -firm name of “Kolm Bros.” One Perkins had in his hands about eight hundred and seventy dollars, which plaintiff claimed to be the money of H. Kolm, who was alleged to be one of the partners.

Plaintiff had the eight hundred and seventy dollars attached in this action as the property of H. Kolm. Bertha Kolm, a sister, filed a complaint in intervention in which she denied that the money so attached was the property of H. Kolm or of “Kolm Bros.,” and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hilton v. . McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Bryce v. JoyntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. C. Yale Jr. & Co. v. P. Hoopes & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
  5. W. H. Letchford & Co. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Swanson v. SiemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Moreland v. Monarch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API