Legal Opinion

Bodenheimer v. Bodenheimer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1973No. 7322SC7PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The case on appeal certified to this Court contains none of the evidence presented at the trial; it does contain the record proper and the trial court’s charge to the jury.

In this appeal the defendant has asserted two assignments of error: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to review any of the evidence presented in the trial, as required by Rule 51 of the rules of procedure; and (2) that the court erroneously instructed the jury as to the law regarding the requisite mental capacity to execute a deed.

Rule 51 requires the trial judge to perform two positive acts: (1) to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Goins v. McLoudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. McDevitt v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. James v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Horne ex rel. Horne v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API