Horne ex rel. Horne v. Wall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
■ Plaintiffs allege that the trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury by failing to relate and apply the law to the *375plaintiffs’ factual contentions. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51 requires that the trial judge summarize the material aspects of the evidence sufficient to bring into focus the controlling legal principles. Clay v. Garner, 16 N.C. App. 510, 192 S.E. 2d 672 (1972).
“Rule 51 requires th,e trial judge to perform two positive acts: (1) to declare and explain the law arising on the evidence presented in the case; and (2) to review such evidence to the extent necessary to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Curlee v. . ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Clay v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Dove v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966