Legal Opinion

McDevitt v. Chandler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1955No. 107PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The court below properly ruled that the judgment in the former proceeding is no bar to the instant action. The general rule is that a judgment rendered on any ground not involving the merits 'of the action may not be used as a basis for the operation of the doctrine of res judicata. Steele v. Beaty, 215 N.C. 680, 2 S.E. 2d 854; 30 Am. Jur., Judgments, section 208; 50 O.J.S., Judgments, section 626. See also Gaither Corporation v. Skinner, ante, 532. And the rule is well established that a judgment of compulsory nonsuit or dismissal not involving the merits of the case is not a bar to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. In re Will of TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Lamb v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. In Re the Will of YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Batson v. City Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API