McDevitt v. Chandler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The court below properly ruled that the judgment in the former proceeding is no bar to the instant action. The general rule is that a judgment rendered on any ground not involving the merits 'of the action may not be used as a basis for the operation of the doctrine of res judicata. Steele v. Beaty, 215 N.C. 680, 2 S.E. 2d 854; 30 Am. Jur., Judgments, section 208; 50 O.J.S., Judgments, section 626. See also Gaither Corporation v. Skinner, ante, 532. And the rule is well established that a judgment of compulsory nonsuit or dismissal not involving the merits of the case is not a bar to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- In re Will of TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Lamb v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- In Re the Will of YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Batson v. City Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bodenheimer v. BodenheimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.