People Ex Rel. Reisig v. Acuna
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
Plaintiff, the District Attorney of Yolo County, initiated this action against the Broderick Boys, an alleged criminal street gang, and 23 of its members to enjoin as a public nuisance their activities in a 2.98-square-mile area of the City of West Sacramento. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and defendants appeal. We conclude sufficient, credible evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion the Broderick Boys is a criminal street gang whose activities have created a public nuisance in the designated area. However, we further conclude…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Department of Social Services v. Ronald P.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Williams v. GarcettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jauregui v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People Ex Rel. Reisig v. AcunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Yu v. University of La VerneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. CasasolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Snatchko v. Westfield llCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.