Legal Opinion

Jauregui v. City of Palmdale

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2014No. B251793PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, City of Palmdale, California, appeals from a September 30, 2013 preliminary injunction secured by plaintiffs, Juan Jauregui, Nigel Holly and V. Jesse Smith. The preliminary injunction, among other things, enjoins defendant from certifying the results of an at-large city council election which was ultimately held on November 5, 2013. Plaintiffs’ sole cause of action is for a violation of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 because of the use of an at-large system for electing city council members. (Elec. Code,1 §§ 14025-14032.)

Defendant…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Lucioni v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Marquez v. City of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Anderson v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Banda v. Wash CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API