Legal Opinion

Union Trust Co. v. Jackson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 30, 1996No. 14750PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The defendants appeal from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to collect a loan evidenced by an unsecured promissory note payable on demand. The defendants claim on appeal that the trial court improperly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact exist that would preclude judgment for the plaintiff as amatter of law. The dispositive issue is whether there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether there was an oral agreement by the *415parties to modify the terms of the promissory note, and, if so,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Town Bank & Trust Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Avon Meadow Condominium Ass'n v. Bank of Boston ConnecticutConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Schratwieser v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Meribear Prods., Inc. v. FrankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API