Legal Opinion

Koegel v. Michigan Trust Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Petition of Eva Koegel for 'an order requiring the Michigan Trust Company, as receiver of the Mecosta County Savings Bank, to pay a claim for rent. From an order granting the petition, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The Michigan Trust Company was appointed receiver of the Mecosta County .Savings Bank upon the petition of the banking commissioner of the State; and on November 16, 1896, all the property of the bank was turned over to it, and it has been in possession since that time. At the time the bank failed, it was occupying a banking office in the Comstock Block, in the city of Big Rapids. The block was owned at the time of the failure, and ever since has been owned, by Daniel F. Comstock, the president of the bank. Since the receiver was appointed, it has occupied the same banking office in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coffin v. . McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Bradley v. Thompson Smith's SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Richards v. La TouretteNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Kull v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McGraw v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. King v. West Coast Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. J. M. Huber Petroleum Co. v. QuillinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Partch v. BoyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API