Legal Opinion
J. M. Huber Petroleum Co. v. Quillin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 26, 1933No. 4016PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This suit was instituted by appellee, George E. Quillin, against the corporate appellants J. M. Huber Petroleum Company and the Dixon Creek Oil & Refining Company, to recover $3,800 alleged by appellee to be due him, as evidenced by certain written contracts.
The appellants answered separately by general demurrer, special exceptions, and general denial.
It was agreed by the appellants that no cross-action would be filed by the J. M. Huber Petroleum Company against the Dixon Creek Oil & Refining Company, but that in the event .appellee recovered judgment for any sum against the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Greenwall Theatrical Circuit Co. v. MarkowitzTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Puckett v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Underberg v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. MulliganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1948