Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Union Trust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1902No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Petition by Prank M. Thompson against the Union Trust Company, receiver of the City Savings Bank of Detroit, to compel the application of a deposit to the payment of certain promissory notes. Prom a decree for petitioner, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The following statement taken from the brief of the counsel for the appellant shows the question involved in this case:
“On the 10th day of February, 1902, the City Savings Bank, a Michigan corporation, located in the city of Detroit, was insolvent; and on that day George L. Maltz, commissioner of the banking department of the State of Michigan, closed and took possession of said bank. On that day there were in the possession of said bank two notes made by Frank M. Thompson, the petitioner, — one for $3,021, dated August 12, 1901, due six months after date, and one for $910, dated January 17,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lindsay v. Jackson & McJimpseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Rothschild v. . MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Smith v. . FeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Matter of HazeltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- McGraw v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- First National Bank v. Nye CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.