Legal Opinion

Kull v. Thompson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The defendants in error brought action in the court below on an agreement in writing by which the firm of C. Kuhl & Sons, the plaintiffs in error, promised to pay Korb & Co. seventy-five barrels fine salt, on demand, at $1.10 per barrel, and which was dated October 27, 1876. Plaintiffs claimed the demand under an assignment made to them November 3, 1876. The assignment appears to have been made by an agent of the co-partnership of Korb & Co., with the consent of one of the members, to apply on a demand against said agent and the partner assenting, and there was no evidence that the other…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. West Coast Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Koegel v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Starr v. Detroit BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API