Legal Opinion
Madary v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1912No. Civ. No. 987PublishedCited by 20 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Geo. E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Upon the merits of the case we are in accord with the views of the Hon. George E. Church, the trial judge, as expressed in the following opinion, which we adopt:
“This action was brought by plaintiff to recover a certain sum or sums of money alleged to have been paid under protest by him and a large number of Ms assignors, taxpayers in the city of Fresno, illegally levied and collected as part of the taxes of 1909.
“The action is grounded upon the following facts, fully and particularly averred:
“That on January 18th, 1909, the board of trustees of the city of Fresno passed an ordinance,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- County of Calaveras v. BrockwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Barber v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gardner v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Golden Gate Mill & Mining Co. v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wuest v. WuestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Helping Hand Home for Children v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bell Community Redevelopment Agency v. WoosleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.