Legal Opinion

Banfield v. Schulderman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1930PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles C. Banfield filed a petition in the Probate Department of the Circuit Court for Multnomah county, Oregon, praying that lot 9, block 5, in Howe's addition to Portland, with the dwelling house thereon and its appurtenances, be set apart as his homestead.

The allegations of the petition are substantially as follows:

On March 26, 1913, the petitioner was intermarried with Marie Banfield, who died on February 2, 1928, an inhabitant of Multnomah county, and possessed of personal and real property, including the property above described, which, at the time of her decease and for ten years…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leet v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Overland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Marvin & Co. v. PiazzaOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Slattery v. NewellOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re Estate of BrizzolariOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API