Legal Opinion
Anthony v. Veatch
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1950PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.
Each of the plaintiffs in this case is the owner and operator of fishing appliances of the type commonly called “fixed gear”, for the taking of salmon from the Columbia River, specifically, pound nets or fish traps. In this opinion, we shall refer to these persons either as “plaintiffs” or as “fixed-gear fishermen”. They brought this action praying for a declaratory judgment declaring Chapter 3, Oregon Laws 1949, as adopted by the people of the state of Oregon through the initiative on November 2, 1948, to be unconstitutional.
The defendants are the members of the Fish Commission of the State…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Federal Power Commission v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.