Legal Opinion

Pacheco v. Judson Manufacturing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1896No. S. F. No. 243PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order granting a nonsuit. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing iron and steel machinery. On April 7, 1892, plaintiff was employed at its works, and, while he was assisting in cutting up a plate of boiler iron by means of a pair of shears weighing some twelve tons and operated by steam, the casting forming the body of the lever or upper jaw of the shears broke; a fragment thereof fell upon plaintiff, and he sustained serious injury; he prosecutes this action to recover *544damages, claiming that defendant was negligent both in the construction of the shears and the oversight of them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Huddleston v. Lowell Machine ShopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. In re Difference & Controversy between E. M. Derby & Co. & City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Brann v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Powers v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API