Legal Opinion
City of Appleton v. Sauer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The first question presented for determination is whether the instant order is appealable. This is a civil action to recover a forefeiture for violation of a munici*617pal ordinance, and the rules of civil procedure apply. Oshkosh v. Lloyd (1949), 255 Wis. 601, 39 N. W. (2d) 772; South Milwaukee v. Schantzen (1950), 258 Wis. 41, 44 N. W. (2d) 628.
Sec. 274.33, Stats., provides in part :
“The following orders when made by the court may be appealed to the supreme court: . . .
“(3) When an order grants, refuses, continues, or modifies a provisional remedy. . . . [Italics supplied.]”
Sec. 269.57, Stats.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Noonan v. OrtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- City of South Milwaukee v. SchantzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. OlesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Churchill v. WelshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Ellinger v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Neenah v. AlsteenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- City of West Allis v. RaineyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Bavarian Soccer Club, Inc. v. PiersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Village of Bayside v. BrunerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Buchen v. Wisconsin Tobacco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.