Legal Opinion

City of Neenah v. Alsteen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1966PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The defendant sought the adverse examination of the plaintiff’s police officers under the provisions of sec. 326.12, Stats.

This statute provides that the. right of adverse examination shall be available “in any civil action.”

The trial judge, however, took the position that the particular violation was unlike the ordinary civil action in that it partook of many of the characteristics of a criminal action. In his opinion he particularly stressed the recent case of Madison v. Geier (1965), 27 Wis. (2d) 687, 135 N. W. (2d) 761, which held that where conduct complained of under an ordinance is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. GeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. SchmiegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. City of Milwaukee v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. City of Neenah v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. City of Milwaukee v. BurnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Prentice v. County Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. KramsvogelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Janesville v. WiskiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API