Legal Opinion

City of South Milwaukee v. Schantzen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1950PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The appellant assigns a number of errors, among them an alteration of the affidavit at the trial by the justice, so that it charged drunken instead of reckless driving; and the sentence of a “fine” when the statute authorizes only a forfeiture, and imprisonment in the house of correction while the ordinance specifies the county jail. The appeal also attacks the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the defendant was found guilty. We do not treat these matters because we think the question of jurisdiction makes discussion of them unnecessary.

Sec. 62.24 (1), Stats., authorizes a city to elect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. SchmiegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. NergaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Detroit Safe Co. v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wiley v. C. Aultman & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Miller v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. KramsvogelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Neenah v. AlsteenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. ThierfelderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. City of Milwaukee v. LeschkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API