Legal Opinion

Mario's Enterprises, Inc. v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1980No. C 79-0624-L(B)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BALLANTINE, District Judge.

Defendant, Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., has alternatively moved the Court: (1) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (2) to grant judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that there is no genuine issue of material fact.

Plaintiff, Mario’s Enterprises, Inc., alleges in its complaint that during a period of time from late 1979 through early 1980 defendant had television advertisements broadcast for one of its products, Pepto-Bismol, which contained statements libelous of plaintiff. Plaintiff operates a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. CMI, Inc. v. Intoximeters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995
  3. Adams v. WFTV, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Tran v. BIGO Technology PTE. LTD.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API