Legal Opinion
Tran v. BIGO Technology PTE. LTD.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 31, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00554Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-00554-GNS-CHL PETER TRAN, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BIGO TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD., et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before the Court is the Motion to Amend the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Peter Tran (“Tran”) and BVN Beauty Supplies, LLC (“BVN”). (DN 17.) Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) filed a response and a reply in opposition. (DNs 18, 19.) Plaintiffs did not file a reply, and the time to do so has expired. Therefore, the motion is ripe for review. I. BACKGROUND On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brooks v. CelesteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Pintando v. Miami-Dade Housing AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.