Legal Opinion
Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 2013No. CC CV10020001; CA A147430; SC S060655PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*650BREWER, J.
This is the second of two cases this court decides today that is concerned with the nonjudicial foreclosure of trust deeds under the Oregon Trust Deed Act (OTDA) and the mortgage finance industry’s practice of naming the Mortgage Electronic Recording System, Inc., (MERS), rather than the lender, as a trust deed’s “beneficiary.” In Brandrup v. ReconTrust Co., 353 Or 668, 303 P3d 301 (2013), we answered questions certified to us by a United States District Court about whether and how that practice comports with the OTDA’s nonjudicial foreclosure requirements. In the present case, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Edelstein v. Bank of New York MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Barringer v. LoderOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- United States Nat. Bank v. HoltonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dennis Woods v. US BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. WalmsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Mikityuk v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Wolf v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.