Legal Opinion

Wolf v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2016No. CV120134; 110021032E; A154115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

This case presents an appeal from judgments in actions that were consolidated below. It requires us to determine whether a borrower who has actual notice that his property is being sold at a trustee’s sale under the Oregon Trust Deeds Act (OTDA),1 is barred from later challenging the sale on the grounds that the entity that executed the sale was neither a validly appointed successor trustee nor the agent of a trustee. We conclude that a person’s property interest under former ORS 86.770(1) (2011), renumbered as ORS 86.797 (2013), cannot be terminated unless a “trustee” as defined in the OTDA…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnot v. Prodehl (In re Neel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  2. DiGregorio v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Troubled Asset Solutions, LLC v. WilcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. PayneMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. Streater v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API