Legal Opinion
Dennis Woods v. US Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 2016No. 13-36037PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOTO, District Judge:
In this case, two borrowers allege that the notice of nonjudicial foreclosure sale required by the Oregon Trust Deed Act (“OTDA”) failed to identify the proper beneficiary, and, therefore, the sale of their home was invalid. The district court dismissed the complaint, and we affirm.
A
I
In 2006, Dennis Woods and Golda Woods (hereinafter referred to collectively as ‘Woods”) executed a promissory note (“Note”) with Homefield Financial, Inc. (“Homefield”). Pursuant to the Note, Homefield loaned Woods $359,500 to purchase residential real property in Clacka-mas, Oregon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- David Pride, Jr. v. M. CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Jeffrey Nielsen v. Ryan ThornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sagendorph (In re Sagendorph)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Stephen Yagman v. Paul GabbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Streater v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- United States v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.